Analysis Of 12 Angry Men And Groupthink - 1519 Words

12 Angry Men and Groupthink The movie â€Å"12 Angry Men,† is one that begins with a judge talking about the circumstances that surround a murder trial where a judge sends the jury off to deliberate on their verdict. Throughout the movie the twelve men struggle between deciding if the defendant if guilty or not guilty for the crime of murdering his own father. If found guilty, the young boy will be sentenced to death. The twelve men spend their time in a hot room debating if this boy is truly guilty or innocent. It is during this time that the viewer can see persuasion, conformity, prejudice, cognitive heuristics, and group polarization. All of which will be discussed throughout the paper as a way to analyze the movie and how it relates to†¦show more content†¦Then halfway through the movie, juror number seven then changes his vote from guilty to not guilty because he was tired and had things to do. He said this after the non-guilty verdicts went from one to seven (Fo nda, Justin, Rose, Lumet, 1957). This also shows groupthink the reason why is that some men like the one that said pass, and the one that changed his vote because he had things to do casted their vote in accordance with the others in the group. This shows how in groups the tendency to be concerned with group solidarity is more important than to critically and realistically evaluate decisions and assumptions (Won-Woo, 1990). The two men had decided their verdict because of others and their decisions as opposed to the evidence and their own personal belief. Authority was used when juror number eight who said not guilty from the beginning went through each piece of evidence proving the boys innocence. Through each bit of evidence that he disproves the other jurors then they begin to see him as credible and switch their vote where he then becomes the majority influence. Prejudice was commonly seen throughout the film where some of the jurors showed discrimination when it came to the d efendant. Specifically juror ten was racially biased, he described the defendant as a slum dweller and that they are criminals (Evirgen, 2009). Juror number ten obscured his own truth of his personal life by sayingShow MoreRelated12 Angry Men Groupthink Analysis724 Words   |  3 Pages12 Angry Men and Groupthink In 12 Angry Men, jurors determined if a young, poor Puerto Rican man murdered his father. Initially, eleven of the men determined that the defendant was guilty of murder; however, one juror held that the defendant was innocent, and he believed the man deserved a chance at being proven innocent. After intense debate, the jury found the defendant not guilty. Even though this movie shows evidence of prejudice, groupthink, conformity, cognitive heuristics, the catalyst ofRead MoreEssay about The Problem of Groupthink in 12 Angry Men934 Words   |  4 PagesThe term groupthink in this report is defined as, the social psychological phenomenon that results in groups during pressure situations. This social psychology theory is broken down into eight signs. Illusion of invulnerability, Collective rationalization, Belief in inherent morality, Stereotyped views of out-groups, Direct pressure on dissenters, Self-censorship, Illusion of unanimity, Self-appointed â€Å"mindguards†. Accord ing to research conducted by Irving Janis, there are three conditions to groupthinkRead MoreGroup Decision-Making, Leadership, Influence and Power: Illustrations from the Film â€Å"12 Angry Men†1703 Words   |  7 PagesThe film â€Å"12 Angry Men (1957)† present a diverse group of twelve American jurors brought together to decide the guilt or innocence of a teenaged defendant in a seemingly open-and-shut murder trial case. The film illustrates the advantages and disadvantages of group decision-making, group developmental stages, leadership personality and models, social influence tactics and outcomes, and the bases of social power. The following advantages of group decision-making were demonstrated in this approximatelyRead MoreMovie 12 Angry By Movie Review1137 Words   |  5 PagesIn this essay I will be an analysis of group communication using the movie 12 Angry Men.The movie 12 Angry men is a movie about a jury made up of 12 men as they deliberate the guilt or acquittal of a defendant on the basis of reasonable doubt. They go through many different problems during the deliberation. The movie starts off with all 12 of the jurors in a room. Nobody knows anybody. Everyone friendly introducing themselves and making conversation. Trying to get to know one another. They knew theyRead MoreConformity - Social Psychology4828 Words   |  20 Pageslegal system, and what challenges are posed in these roles? Using the film, 12 Angry Men as your basis, discuss the two most significant illustrations of social psychology in the film. Finally, how can psychological findings be applied to improve the legal system, and what effect should these findings have on the legal process? There are few examples of group dynamics as complete and realistic as the film Twelve Angry Men. This film was not only entertaining, but it also serves as a great exampleRead MoreManaging for the Future Organizational Behavior Processes7280 Words   |  30 Pagesyour custom Ancona textbook: Check Module Order Here to Module in Text PRICE Select (Place numbers in box) Module 1 The New Organization: Taking Action in an Era of Organizational Transformation $7.00 Module 2 Three Lenses on Organizational Analysis and Action $7.00 Module 3 Making Teams Work $7.00 Module 4 Diverse Cognitive Styles in Teams $7.00 Module 5 Team Processes $7.00 Module 6 Teams in Organizations $7.00 Module 7 Workforce Management: Employment Relationships in Changing OrganizationsRead MoreSociology and Group41984 Words   |  168 Pagese. 966 Answer: e. 966 . What is the ideal group size for a problem-solving discussion? a. 3–5 people b. 4–6 people c. 5–7 people d. 6–9 people e. 8–12 people Answer: c. 5–7 people . According to your textbook, the most important factor separating successful groups from unsuccessful ones is a. having a minimum of 5 and a maximum of 12 members in a group. b. a clear goal. c. strong leadership. d. member independence and interdependence. e. group morale. Answer: b. a clear goal. Read MoreStephen P. Robbins Timothy A. Judge (2011) Organizational Behaviour 15th Edition New Jersey: Prentice Hall393164 Words   |  1573 PagesManager, Production: Lisa Rinaldi Full-Service Project Management: Christian Holdener, S4Carlisle Publishing Services Composition: S4Carlisle Publishing Services Printer/Binder: Courier/Kendallville Cover Printer: Courier/Kendalville Text Font: 10.5/12 ITC New Baskerville Std Credits and acknowledgments borrowed from other sources and reproduced, with permission, in this textbook appear on the appropriate page within text. Copyright  © 2013, 2011, 2009, 2007, 2005 by Pearson Education, Inc., publishingRead MoreDeveloping Management Skills404131 Words   |  1617 PagesCover Design: Suzanne Duda Lead Media Project Manager: Denise Vaughn Full-Service Project Management: Sharon Anderson/BookMasters, Inc. Composition: Integra Software Services Printer/Binder: Edwards Brothers Cover Printer: Coral Graphics Text Font: 10/12 Weidemann-Book Credits and acknowledgments borrowed from other sources and reproduced, with permission, in this textbook appear on appropriate page within text. Copyright  © 2011, 2007, 2005, 2002, 1998 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as PrenticeRead MoreProject Mgmt296381 Words   |  1186 PagesLeadership Chapter 2 Organization Strategy and Project Selection 1.4 Projects and programs (.2) 1.4.1 Managing the portfolio 1.4.3 Strategy and projects 2.3 Stakeholders and review boards 12.1 RFP’s and vendor selection (.3.4.5) 11.2.2.6 SWAT analysis 6.5.2.7 Schedule compression 9.4.2.5 Leadership skills G.1 Project leadership 10.1 Stakeholder management Chapter 11 Teams Chapter 3 Organization: Structure and Culture 2.4.1 Organization cultures [G.7] 2.4.2 Organization structure